|
Owl:
More often that not news articles have varying interpretations based on each readers
awareness of the history and background. Especially when people are quoted in the articles.
Here we have provided some important aspect that a reader would eventually uncover
after reading several articles. Seeing this first will help in the first few articles.
As you follow these stories and notice where complaints were raised, legislators or other
officials would make a chest thumping show of how terrible this abuse. Proclaim
how they were going to shut off some part of this loophole ridding the temple of the
money changers. Then later we would learn, the promise was not follow through or
the scam shifted over to another loophole.
Now the IRS is question the "tax loophole" claim.
The information presented here shows how state officials are willingly violating their oath
to protect the interest of the public, in order to help and protect wealthy investors using
tax loopholes, gain large fortunes from state funds.
A few good reporters have given us different pieces of the puzzle. But, the reporters and
everyone else, is being stonewalled by the Oklahoma Tax Abuse Permission Commission, which
refuses to reveal the names of those involved in these programs. The names of the investors
are key pieces of the puzzle. Pieces that could tie in state officials who, by acts of
commission or omission, are a party to the conspiracy to defraud. Robbing the state
of $millions.
The state legislature created the loopholes. By turning their backs, those occupying
the offices of Governor, Attorney General and State Auditor and Inspector have violated
the oaths of those offices.
The Oklahoma Tax Commission by blessing the fraud and giving official absolution to the
fraudulent investors are a party to the scheme. In refusing to allow access to the names
of those benefiting from the scam, and how much has been lost, the commission is aiding
in the protection.
Official's denials and excuses are too hard to accept could happen where normal
intelligence is involved.
Still many believe our state officials are innocent of wrong doing, in turning their backs,
while an unchecked fraudulent scheme thrives draining $millions from state funds, badly under
funded education, roads and bridges, health care, etc.
In today's political climate, with elections so costly, influence is bought in
the form of campaign fund contributions. Campaign donations offer a better disguise
for the donor than most other money transactions.
We can't ignore that wrong doing can be achieved thru blackmail as easy as campaign
funding, and other financial enhancements. With some individuals, where the opportunity
is available, blackmail can be more effective and cheaper.
|